Petro Maps Master List

 

Welcome

Club Information
- Newsletter
- Joining
- By-Laws
- Officers
- Roadmaps-L Mailing List
- Member Services
- Club Events
- News

Map Information
- Official Maps Master List
- Petro Maps Master List
- Dating Rand and Gousha Maps
- Interpreting Rand Codes

Buy/Sell/Trade Maps
- Commercial Dealers
- Member Dealers
- Member's Wish List
- Other Events (oldgas.com)

Miscellaneous
- Road and Roadmap Links

 

Purpose

A master list of official state- and province-issued road maps (the OMML) exists today. A master list of petroleum road map issues would be a worthy counterpart to the OMML and is desired by collectors and historians who focus on this genre of map.

The set of issuers of official maps is finite and fairly constant and consists of the 50 United States and 12 Canadian provinces and territorial jurisdictions. While there were undoubtedly roadblocks on the way to the compilation of the OMML, any project to catalog petroleum map issues has a higher magnitude of complexity. The set of petroleum firms issuing road maps is far from constant and has changed over the years as a result of incorporation, merger, spin-off, and dissolution. Furthermore, no official archives exist for petroleum-issued maps as they do for state issues.

Scope of project

In order to give this complex listing project some hope of completion, it is necessary to limit the project's scope. To this end, a set of inclusion criteria are provided below. Maps excluded by the various criteria are certainly worthy of similar documentation efforts and should be considered for inclusion in this or another list in the future when and if resources become available.

Project stages

The magnitude of the project is such that it needs to be addressed incrementally. It is anticipated that each of the project stages would provide useful data to collectors in and of itself as well as laying the groundwork for later stages of the project. Almost by definition, this project is non-ending, due to the possibility of discovering previously-unknown petroleum map issues, not to mention contemporary petroleum map issues such as the new Exxon map series.

Anticipated project stages are listed as follows in likely sequence of compilation. Note that in general, later project stages depend on the completion of previous stages.

Master list of issuing brands and issuers
Master list of cover designs
Master list of individual map issues

Master list of brands and issuers

Definitions

First, some basic definitions:

brand

A brand consists of a name or logo used to establish a recognizable entity in the mind of the consumer. Brands are typically associated with regional, national, or even worldwide organizations but can sometimes be associated with local jobbers or retailers.

Some jobbers and retailers are considered unbranded. This term is used to denote jobbers and retailers which don't have a close business relationship with a refiner or distributor and which lack a contract permitting the jobber or retailer use of the refiner or distributor's brand name for retail sales. When this type of loose relationship with a refiner or distributor exists, these firms act merely as a supply source for the jobber or retailer who will in turn re-sell the fuel under their own name. In spite of the traditional definition of unbranded, this project's scope shall include maps issued by and imprinted with the name and/or logo of a local jobber or retailer. The map issuer may be a firm involved in any part of the process between production and retail sale so long as the issuing brand is used in conjunction with the retail sale of gasoline.

issuer An issuer name consists of the corporate name, which may or may not be the same as the brand(s) used to retail motor fuels.

Inclusion criteria

Maps included in the listing shall meet all of the following conditions:

1.

For the purposes of this master list, a map is considered to be a petroleum-issued map or atlas if it was issued by a firm involved in the retail sale of petroleum-based fuels for motor vehicle highway transport. Maps issued by large petroleum company marketing departments, or more localized distributors, jobbers, or retailers shall qualify.

 

Explanation:

Most petroleum road maps were issued by firms whose principal function was the retail of motor fuels and are generally associated with those gasoline brands to the exclusion of other products such as lubricating oil. While many firms marketed both fuels and lubricants under the same brand name, others had separate brands (Phillips gasoline vs. Trop-Arctic oil, Flying A gas vs. Veedol oil, and so forth). It does not seem practical for the listing project to encompass brand names for adjunct products such as lubricants or TBA products.

Yet, a number of interesting maps (mostly of an early vintage) were issued by firms involved solely in the sale of petroleum-based lubricants. In the interest of including these maps, a exception to the petroleum-based motor fuel criteria is warranted. Accordingly, maps issued by firms involved in the retail sale of petroleum-based lubricants shall be included in the brand listing provided that no accompanying motor fuel brand name appears on the map.

Maps issued by convenience store or department stores (e.g., Sears, Roebuck & Company) are included if the issuing firm engaged in retail sales of petroleum fuel.

Excluded would be maps issued by tire companies, department stores, hotels, banks, auto clubs like AAA, etc. unless one or more qualifying petroleum brand identification accompanies any identification of non-petroleum entities on the map.

2.

Inclusion in this master list shall be limited to maps used for navigation on roads and highways.

 

Explanation:

Many petroleum firms issued a variety of maps used for purposes other than highway navigation. Examples include the many waterway maps, maps of various World's Fairs, maps of oil production fields, and the World War II maps issued by Esso and several other firms. These maps, while interesting, are not usable for highway navigation and thus do not qualify for inclusion in this phase of the brand listing.

Several petroleum firms issue station locator guides. These maps are typically of a contemporary (1990s) nature, an example being the locator maps issued by the Sheetz convenience store chain. While the cartography of these maps is not detailed and the maps' emphasis is simply to show station locations, the Sheetz maps can be used for navigation and thus qualify as road maps for the purpose of this project.

Several station locator guides give station locations in text form and include thumbnail-sized maps of the immediate vicinity of each station. This type of thumbnail map is generally useful as a supplement to other cartographic resources. Since these thumbnail maps are not particularly useful for highway navigation in and of itself, such locator guides shall not qualify as road maps for the purpose of this project.

Several petroleum firms issued special purpose maps. An example is Atlantic's fishing map of Pennsylvania which shows particular varieties of fish common in various rivers and lakes of that state. While the primary purpose of these fishing maps is to show fishing spots, the maps consist of data of interest to sport fishermen superimposed on a regular road map. Since these maps can be used for highway navigation, their special purpose and special titling do not disqualify them from inclusion in the road map brand listing.

3.

A petroleum brand name shall be eligible for inclusion in the listing if the brand name appears in either textual or graphical form as follows:

the brand identification appears on the front or rear cover of one or more documented folding map issues;
the brand identification appears on the front cover of one or more documented road atlases;
the brand identification appears on either side of one or more documented sheet map issues.

Brand identification applied by means of an adhesive sticker or rubber stamp shall qualify.

 

Explanation:

Brands or issuers whose identification is limited to the inside of a fold-up map or to the rear cover of a road atlas shall not qualify for inclusion in this listing. When petroleum brand identification is so inconspicuous as to fail this criteria, it can be assumed to take the role of a mere advertisement on a map or atlas issued by some non-petroleum entity. Such a map does not qualify as issued by a petroleum firm.

4.

Both brands and issuers shall be documented in the master list. Each significant change in issuer corporate names shall be treated as an individual issuing entity even if a change in brand name usage did not occur as a result. Likewise, each significant change in brand identification shall be treated as an individual brand entity even where the issuing corporation name did not change.

 

Explanation:

Consider the Flying A brand originally derived with Associated Oil Co. of California but later adopted at the former Tydol locations in the east and midwest after the Tide Water and Associated companies merged. A search for one of the affiliated issuer names would return a subset of the following brands:

Associated
Associated Flying A
Flying A
Tydol
Tydol Flying A

A search for one of the affiliated brand names would return an appropriate subset of the following issuer names:

Associated
Getty
Tide Water (both pre-1938 and 1956-1967 companies)
Tide Water Associated
Tidewater

These requirements ease searching of multiple brands used by a single issuer (i.e., a particular oil company) and makes it easier to find relationships between issuers and the brands used by those issuers to identify petroleum products.

5.

Issuer names may be identified on the map itself or derived from external sources.

Maps often include corporate identification on the map cover or elsewhere such as on a legend inside the map. Where such identification appears on a map, it shall be used to the exclusion of identification derived from external sources.

When no corporate identification is present on a map, an authoritative reference such as the company's annual reports or National Petroleum News may be used as a source of proper corporate identification to be used as the map issuer in the listing. Such external identification shall be consistent with the date of the map's issue.

 

Explanation:

Many maps issued by Standard of California (Socal) and their Standard of Texas subsidiary had identical or extremely similar covers which did not specifically identify the issuing company. There is also some overlap between the territory covered by Socal and its Texas subsidiary. However, without exception, the specific company name is identified in the map legend. This identification shall be used as an authoritative source of the map issuer, even though the map covers do not specifically identify "Standard Oil Company of California" or "Standard Oil Company of Texas".

6.

Each differing combination of two or more brand names shall be considered a distinct entry.

Neither the sequence in which brand names appear on a map, nor the predominance of one brand name with respect to other brand name(s) shall be considered significant.

In general, query results for brand combinations shall be displayed in alphabetical order in the interest of consistency.

 

Explanation:

For example, Western Oil & Fuel Co. of Minneapolis (a subsidiary of Conoco for the latter part of its life) used three brands: DS, Mileage, and Western. Considering Western and its parent Conoco, maps are known to have been issued with the following combinations of brands:

Mileage / DS
Mileage / DS / Western
Western
Conoco
Conoco / Mileage / DS

Distinct entries in the listing shall be provided for each of these brand combinations. A search for one of the brands shall yield a result set that includes each matching combination of brands in which the search criteria appears.

A brand name search for the "DS" brand would yield each of the above brand combinations containing "DS".

An issuer name search for "Conoco" or "Western" would yield each of the brand combinations issued by the respective issuing company.

7.

Each differing combination of two or more issuer names shall be considered a distinct entry.

Neither the sequence in which issuer names appear on a map, nor the predominance of one issuer name with respect to other issuer name(s) shall be considered significant.

In general, query results for issuer combinations shall be displayed in alphabetical order in the interest of consistency.

 

Explanation:

Beginning with its entry into the United States in the late Fifties, American Petrofina issued road maps for its Fina brand. Fina-branded maps of Denver exist which are stylistically similar to the conventional Fina map and which identify American Petrofina in the same way as the conventional Fina maps. But in addition, these Denver issues also bear a reference to Park Petroleum, Inc., presumably Fina's local jobber/distributor. This constitutes a map with multiple issuers. Considering Fina branded maps in the United States, the following issuer combinations exist:

American Petrofina
American Petrofina / Park Petroleum, Inc.

Distinct entries in the listing shall be provided for each of these issuer combinations. A search for one of the issuers shall yield a result set that includes each matching combination of issuers in which the search criteria appears.

An issuer search for the "American Petrofina" issuer would yield both of the above issuer combinations since they contain that issuer name. But an issuer search for "Park Petroleum, Inc." (or some substring thereof) would yield only the one issuer combination which included that company's name.

A brand name search for "Fina" would yield each of the issuer combinations corresponding to a company or companies issuing Fina branded maps.

8.

Distinct issuers using the same brand to operate in different regions shall be treated as separate entities with the issuer name being used to distinguish the brands.

 

Explanation:

A non-exhaustive list of distinct issuers which used the same brand name at one time or another include:

Bay (Colorado) vs. Bay (Michigan)
Colonial (several instances)
Co-Op (several instances)
Erickson Oil Co. vs. Erickson Oil Products
Hudson of Delaware vs. Hudson (Kansas City)
Imperial (several instances)
Martin Oil Co. vs. Martin Oil Service
North Star (Minnesota) vs. North Star (Canada)
Richfield (California) vs. Richfield (New York)
Supertest (Canada) vs. SuperTest (Florida)
White Rose (several instances)
Zephyr (Missouri) vs. Zephyr (Michigan)

With a worldwide scope, no doubt far more examples will turn up of totally unrelated issuing companies that happen to use the same name in different parts of the world.

A special note with respect to Richfield: Though the east coast and west coast companies using the Richfield brand share some history (both their origins and disposition), they operated as separate companies, did not overlap with respect to territory, and are not known to have ever had map designs which were common to the two companies. For these reasons, they are considered separate issuers.

9.

Maps wherein petroleum brands and/or petroleum issuers appear in combination with non-petroleum brands/issuers shall be included in the master list. Such non-petroleum brands and issuers shall be treated in the same way as specified above for combinations of petroleum brands/issuers.

 

Explanation:

Many early maps carried both the name of an petroleum company and that of a tire company. These are legitimate candidates for inclusion because a petroleum firm was involved in the issuing of such maps.

10.

Each operation within a distinct country shall be considered as a separate issuer. This is justified by the fact that many major brands market in the U. S. and Canada as well as in other countries outside North America.

 

Explanation:

Brand names such as BP, Caltex, Esso, Fina, Mobil, Shell, and Texaco belongs to a multinational company which owns and operates a separate subsidiary entity for each country in which it operates. Moreover, each of the individual national subsidiaries can issue visually distinct series of maps which occasionally overlap each others' territories. This overlap is particularly noticeable for companies operating in both the U. S. and Canada but is known to occur overseas.

Since later project stages might include more detailed listings of map cover designs and even individual map issues, it is desirable from the outset to make these distinctions by country even when multiple map-issuing companies exist as siblings within a single corporate family and share a common brand name. Furthermore, the utility of generating listings of brands/issuers operating within specific countries is recognized. By distinguishing national subsidiaries, this distinction can be made. For example, the name of the entity issuing BP-branded maps in Australia would be listed as "BP Australia Ltd." and the entity issuing BP-branded maps in France would be "Société Française des Pétroles BP S. A.".

As provided elsewhere, each changed in the name of these national issuing entities would result in a distinct list entry.

11.

Minor variations in the phraseology of a brand name as it appears on a map shall not constitute separate brands.

However, in a situation wherein the predominant and unique component of a brand name changes, each such variant shall be considered a distinct brand.

In some cases, the only change to a brand name may be a change to or from possessive form or a change in hyphenization or similar typographic alteration. Such variants shall normally constitute distinct brands in the listing.

 

Explanation:

Early Standard of Indiana signage used a rectangular logo marked "Standard Service" with both words having equal prominence. Western Oil and Fuel Company's signage in the Fifties used the wording "Better Mileage Gasoline", which was later simplified to "Mileage". A number of other firms' early brand identification used words such as "oil", "gas", "products", "service", and "stations".

Marketing experts eventually realized that with signage like "Standard Service", the secondary word "Service" tended to compete with the company's principal identification as "Standard". With the desire to provide strong brand and image recognition in the mind of the consumer (especially at modern highway speeds), the secondary words were generally dropped.

Secondary words such as those mentioned above are not unique and are not protected in the same way as would be a true brand name. Moreover, they are neither an important or consistent component of the brand identification. Words like "Ashland" are are significant; words like "Products" are not. Accordingly, secondary words used in signage or other product identification shall not normally be considered as part of a brand name.

Examples of simple typographic alteration include the brands "Clark's" vs. "Clark" and "D-X" vs. "DX". Each of the typographic variants shall qualify as distinct brand names because the predominant part of the brand name changed. "Mobilgas" vs. "Mobil" would likewise be considered as distinct brand names.

Areas worth special mention

The variety of petroleum brands and issuer identification adds complexity to a comprehensive listing project such as this. Several specific areas are worth specific mention:

 

 

 

 

 

In the years closely following the Standard Oil break-up of 1911, several of the Standard companies used similar ball-and-bar logos bearing the "Standard" name. For maps issued during this period, the appropriate Standard company (California, Indiana, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, etc.) would be listed as the issuer name, with "Standard" listed as the brand.
Maps bearing the Esso logo were issued by several companies (Standard of Pennsylvania, Standard of Louisiana, and Standard of New Jersey), the Pennsylvania and Louisiana companies being subsidiaries of Jersey Standard. The respective issuer names should correspond to the above company names, and with "Esso" listed as the brand name. In later years, the issuer name was "Humble Oil & Refining" alongside the brand names "Enco", "Esso", and "Humble".
A few companies expanded from regional to multi-regional marketing territory through acquisition of other companies. For example, the Socony-Vacuum company acquired several regional companies (General Petroleum, Lubrite, Wadhams, White Eagle, White Star, etc.). For part of the Thirties, the regional companies maintained their individual identities albeit with increasing use of Socony-Vacuum's "Mobilgas" brand. The brand listing entry would use the appropriate regional company as the issuer name and "Mobilgas" as the brand name.
A similar situation exists with Cities Service and their regional companies (Crew-Levick, Iowa Oil, Loreco, Warner-Quinlan, etc.); the brand listing should include the regional company as the issuer name and "Cities Service" as the brand. For maps that had a special variant of the Cities Service "clover" logo bearing, say, the Crew-Levick name, the brand listing entry should include both Cities Service and Crew-Levick as brand names.
Some Sovereign Service maps bore the large Sovereign logo and in small type on the rear cover bore the names of several affiliated companies. Other Sovereign maps had an additional brand name (such as Derby or Kanotex) overprinted on the front cover. In the first example, the brand listing entry would include the individual affiliate names from the small-type listing on the rear cover as the issuer name and "Sovereign" as the brand name. In the second example, the brand listing entry should include "Derby" or "Kanotex" (as the case may be) with "Sovereign" as a dual brand.
The territories covered by maps issued by major brands were limited to the maps offered by the major cartographers and were further limited by practical constraints such as the small demand for maps of smaller municipalities. Since jobbers or retailers cater to a more local audience, some found it desirable to issue their own maps of municipalities that weren't part of the major brand's map series. The process of listing these maps is generally straightforward -- many jobbers or retailers used "generic" map covers printed with their name and/or logo without mention of an affiliated major brand. But a counter-example would be maps like the map of Tampa, Florida issued by the Sherrill Oil Company operating in that area; this map includes the Pure logo and the Sherrill name but based on the design (not a "normal" Pure design) is clearly a locally-issued map outside the brand's map series. The brand listing entry for this type of map should use Sherrill Oil as the issuer name and Pure as the brand if the major brand name and/or logo appears on the map.

Data elements for master list of brands and issuers

Brand name(s)
Issuer name(s) (Note: care should be taken to consider significant corporate name changes.)
issuing country
First and last known years of road map or road atlas issue (Note: this feature exists as a convenience and shall be superseded at a later date by listings of individual issues.)
Branding method(s)
Map format(s)
Successor brand(s)
Successor issuer(s)
Comments

Master list of cover designs

The attraction of road map collecting is not limited to the study of the cartography of individual maps. Some petroleum companies issuing maps used virtually the same cover art for a span of a decade or more, while others varied their basic map series design every few years. Yet others used individualistic designs or photography for every state, province, or other territory used, varying this cover art every year.

It is recognized that many collectors pursue maps with different cover art for the aesthetic value of those covers and place an emphasis on collecting as many distinct designs for their favorite brands/issuers as possible. For these collectors, a means by which to determine whether (for example) the design of Deep Rock maps changed between 1964 and 1965 would be useful. To some, this method of distinguishing road maps is more meaningful (and more practical) than determining the specific cartographic differences between the two issues.

To this end, a master list of petroleum map cover designs would be a logical extension to the master list of issuing brands and issuers. A possible feature of this project stage could include digital images of each series.

While this document does not attempt to address all the possibilities and pitfalls of the cover design master list at this early stage of the project, it is worth setting down a few cautionary notes.

An attempt to document every cover design is impractical at this project stage and in any event is a formidable task. This is particularly relevant with respect to maps such as the beautiful map series issued by Standard Oil of California, Chevron, and Calso depicting scenic panoramas rendered in water color. Similar arguments could be made about the Shell photo map series of the Sixties or the Standard/Amoco series appearing just before the United States' bicentennial. Documenting every one of these scenes is not necessary to the task of documenting the basic cover art series and is more appropriately left for the final stage of the project when individual map issues are documented.

Additional thought should be given to the question of the criteria used to determine what constitutes a new cover design. Subtle changes in, type style, or wording or appearance of advertising can take place without a major design change. While something like a change of type style might appear to be fairly fundamental, would such a change in and of itself constitute a new cover design?

Data elements for master list of cover designs

The data elements maintained for each cover design entry should include:

Reference to appropriate brand combination entry
Textual description of basic elements of design
Approximate start and end years during which the design was in use
Hyperlink to stored digital image of an example of cover design
Comments

Master list of individual map issues

The ultimate conclusion of this project would be a complete listing ("compendium") of all petroleum map issues. It should go without saying that this is the most formidable part of the project and the one which will truly become a constant-maintenance item as new maps and variants are discovered and included in the listing. Since this project phase is dependent on the two preceding phases, it seems reasonable to defer detailed discussion of the mechanics of this phase until such time as it is practical to begin work.

Data elements for master list of individual map issues

This is intended as a non-comprehensive list of data elements that might be used to list individual map issues:

Reference to appropriate brand combination entry
Reference to appropriate cover design entry
Territory covered
Cartographer
Date code
Year of issue (derived from date code)
Printed date (where exists)
Status flags (atlas vs. map, generic cover, brand markings included in interior, list or graphical display of service station locations appears, etc.)
Map size
Fold style (unfolded sheet, accordion, tri-fold, etc.)
Hyperlink to stored digital image of map cover(s)
Comments

 

Jon Roma <roma@uiuc.edu>
September 16, 1999

Webmaster: Matt Alberts webmaster@roadmaps.org
Last Updated Tuesday, November 26, 2002.
All pages Copyright © 2002 by the Road Map Collectors Association.